Cited by 32Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorStress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-being

Effets du soutien organisationnel perçu et des caractéristiques de l’emploi sur l’anxiété au travail et l’épuisement professionnel : le rôle médiateur de la satisfaction des besoins psychologiques

Open access
Gillet, N., Fouquereau, E., Huyghebaert, T., Colombat, P.·2016·Psychologie Française

Abstract

Résumé L’objectif de cette étude était de démontrer le rôle médiateur de la satisfaction des besoins psychologiques d’autonomie, de compétence et d’affiliation dans les relations entre, d’une part, le soutien organisationnel perçu et trois caractéristiques motivationnelles dans la sphère professionnelle (i.e., l’identité de la tâche, l’importance de la tâche et l’autonomie dans la planification du travail), et d’autre part, l’anxiété au travail et l’épuisement professionnel. Quatre cent cinquante-sept salariés (216 hommes et 241 femmes) travaillant dans différents secteurs d’activité (ex., industrie, commerce, artisanat) ont participé à cette recherche. Les résultats ont révélé que le soutien organisationnel perçu et les caractéristiques de l’emploi étaient positivement reliés à la satisfaction des besoins psychologiques. En outre, la satisfaction de ces trois besoins était négativement associée à l’anxiété au travail et à l’épuisement professionnel. Les implications de ce travail et les perspectives de recherche ultérieure sont discutées.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psfr.2014.05.004

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study used a validated need satisfaction questionnaire initially developed by Gillet, Rosnet, and Vallerand (2008), slightly adapted to the educational context.

    “Participants' need satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire initially developed and validated by Gillet, Rosnet, and Vallerand (2008) (see also Gillet, Fouquereau, Huyghebaert, & Colombat, 2016), which was slightly adapted to the educational context for purposes of the present study.”

    From University students' need satisfaction trajectories: A growth mixture analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Gillet et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gillet, N., Fouquereau, E., Huyghebaert, T., & Colombat, P.
Affiliations
Université de Tours (FR)
Corresponding author
Gillet, N.
Venue
Psychologie Française
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
73-81
ISSN
0033-2984 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072615689
Cited by
32
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychologie Française (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
perceived organizational support, job characteristics, psychological need satisfaction, autonomy, competence, affiliation, workplace anxiety, burnout, task identity, task significance, employee autonomy, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review