Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings.

Jon M. Werner·1994·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Levels of in-role and extrarole performance were experimentally manipulated in a 3 X 2 withinsubjects design. Dimensions capturing both in-role and extrarole behaviors (i.e., citizenship behaviors directed toward other individuals) strongly influenced various measures of rater search strategies as well as the ratings given by 116 supervisors evaluating secretarial performance. Furthermore, as predicted by D. W. Organ (1990), dimension ratings assigned to ratees with high levels of extrarole behavior displayed significantly more halo than ratings given to ratees with neutral levels of extrarole behavior. Tests for the effects of level of extrarole behavior on 2 measures of rater accuracy produced contradictory results. Implications are discussed.

Cites (4)

  1. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
    BARRICK, MURRAY R., MOUNT, MICHAEL K. · 1991 · Personnel Psychology
  2. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
    Kirk, Roger · 2013
  3. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
    McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T. · 1987 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance
    MacKenzie, Scott B, Podsakoff, Philip M, Fetter, Richard · 1991 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Show all 4 references

Cited by (9)

  1. Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research
    Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Paine, Julie Beth, Bachrach, Daniel G. · 2000 · Journal of Management
  2. HELPING AND VOICE EXTRA-ROLE BEHAVIORS: EVIDENCE OF CONSTRUCT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITY.
    Van Dyne, L., LePine, J. A. · 1998 · Academy of Management Journal
  3. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis
    Podsakoff, Nathan P., Whiting, Steven W., Podsakoff, Philip M., Blume, Brian D. · 2009 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach.
    Rotundo, Maria, Sackett, Paul R. · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  5. Leader-Member Exchange as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Followers' Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior
    Wang, Hui, Law, Kenneth S., Hackett, Rick D., Wang, Duanxu, Chen, Zhen Xiong · 2005 · Academy of Management Journal

See all 281

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.79.1.98
The paper
Werner, J. M. (1994). Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.79.1.98

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.