The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion.

Abstract

Results of an experiment comparing face-to-face groups with anonymous and identified computer-supported groups challenged theoretical arguments (V. S. Rao & S. L. Jarvenpaa, 1991) that computer-based group decision support systems (GDSS) can increase group decision quality by facilitating expression of minority opinions. In groups working on a hidden-profile investment decision task, minority opinion holders expressed their arguments most frequently under anonymous GDSS communication, but the influence of the minority arguments on private opinions and on group decisions was highest under face-to-face communication. These results suggest that the conditions that facilitate the expression of minority arguments may also diminish the influence of those arguments. The implications of these findings for a normative view of social influence, for social presence theory, and for the effects of GDSS on participation rates in group discussion are discussed.

Cites (6)

1. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
   Deutsch, Morton, Gerard, Harold B. · 1955 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
2. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
   Asch, Solomon E. · 1956 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
3. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
   Kiesler, Sara, Siegel, Jane, McGuire, Timothy W. · 1984 · American Psychologist
4. Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion
   Stasser, Garold, Titus, William · 1985 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. Deviation, rejection and communication
   Schachter, Stanley · 1951 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
6. Panacea or Panopticon?: The Hidden Power in Computer-Mediated Communication
   SPEARS, RUSSELL, LEA, MARTIN · 1994 · Communication Research

Show all 6 references

Cited by (10)

1. Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
   Ilgen, Daniel R., Hollenbeck, John R., Johnson, Michael, Jundt, Dustin · 2005 · Annual Review of Psychology
2. Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?
   Martins, Luis L., Gilson, Lucy L., Maynard, M. Travis · 2004 · Journal of Management
3. Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis
   Mesmer-Magnus, Jessica R., DeChurch, Leslie A. · 2009 · Journal of Applied Psychology
4. Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis
   Richardson, Jennifer C., Maeda, Yukiko, Lv, Jing, Caskurlu, Secil · 2017 · Computers in Human Behavior
5. Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior
   Postmes, Tom, Spears, Russell, Sakhel, Khaled, de Groot, Daphne · 2001 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

See all 236