Cited by 787Online and Blended LearningVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis

Richardson, Jennifer C., Maeda, Yukiko, Lv, Jing, Caskurlu, Secil·2017·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Richardson, Jennifer C.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
71
Pages
402-417
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2584503943
Cited by
787
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 8
FWCI
15.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
social presence, online learning, student satisfaction, perceived learning, online courses, course duration, disciplinary differences, student motivation, student retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review