"Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience.
Abstract
People viewed a security video and tried to identify the gunman from a photospread. The actual gunman was not in the photospread and all eyewitnesses made false identifications (n = 352). Following the identification, witnesses were given confirming feedback (Good, you identified the actual suspect), disconfirming feedback (Actually, the suspect is number ―), or no feedback. The manipulations produced strong effects on the witnesses' retrospective reports of (a) their certainty, (b) the quality of view they had, (c) the clarity of their memory, (d) the speed with which they identified the person, and (e) several other measures. Eyewitnesses who were asked about their certainty prior to the feedback manipulation (Experiment 2) were less influenced, but large effects still emerged on some measures. The magnitude of the effect was as strong for those who denied that the feedback influenced them as it was for those who admitted to the influence.
Cites (33)
- Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences1990 · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
- Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).Lachenbruch, Peter A., Cohen, Jacob · 1989 · Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Nisbett, Richard E., Wilson, Timothy D. · 1977 · Psychological Review
- Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.Baruch Fischhoff · 1975 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line.Hastie, Reid, Park, Bernadette · 1986 · Psychological Review
- Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence^accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies.Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig, Penrod, Steven, Read, Don, Cutler, Brian · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
- Crime and delinquencyMartin R. Haskell, Lewis Yablonsky · 1978
- What do we know about eyewitness identification?Wells, Gary L. · 1993 · American Psychologist
- Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.Wells, Gary L., Lindsay, R. C., Ferguson, Tamara J. · 1979 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender.Roy S. Malpass, Patricia G. Devine · 1981 · Journal of Applied Psychology
Cited by (7)
- The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.Schacter, Daniel L. · 1999 · American Psychologist
- The Science of False Memory2005
- Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories.Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig · 2001 · Psychology Public Policy and Law
- The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New SynthesisWixted, John T., Wells, Gary L. · 2017 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- The neuroscience of memory: implications for the courtroomLacy, Joyce W., Stark, Craig E. L. · 2013 · Nature Reviews Neuroscience
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.83.3.360
- The paper
- Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.83.3.360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.