Expertise in professional software design: A process study.
Abstract
Forty professional software designers participated in a study in which they worked on a software design task and reported strategies for accomplishing that task. High performers were identified by a peer-nomination method and performance on a design. Verbal protocol analysis based on a comparison of 12 high and 12 moderate performers indicated that high performers structured their design process by local planning and showed more feedback processing, whereas moderate performers were more engaged in analyzing requirements and verbalizing task-irrelevant cognitions. High performers more often described problem comprehension and cooperation with colleagues as useful strategies. High and moderate performers did not differ with respect to length of experience. None of the differences between the two performance groups could be explained by length of experience.
Cites (7)
- The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performanceEricsson, K. Anders, Krampe, Ralf T., Tesch-Römer, Clemens · 1993 · Psychological Review
- The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.Kluger, Avraham N., DeNisi, Angelo · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin
- Plans and the structure of behavior.Miller, George A., Galanter, Eugene, Pribram, Karl H. · 1960
- Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as DataEricsson, K. Anders, Simon, Herbert A. · 1993
- Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology.Carver, Charles S., Scheier, Michael F. · 1982 · Psychological Bulletin
- EXPERT AND EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE: Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task ConstraintsEricsson, K. A., Lehmann, A. C. · 1996 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation.Kraiger, Kurt, Ford, J. Kevin, Salas, Eduardo · 1993 · Journal of Applied Psychology
Cited by (12)
- The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert PerformanceEricsson, K. Anders · 2006 · The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
- Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomesMartin, Bruce C., McNally, Jeffrey J., Kay, Michael J. · 2013 · Journal of Business Venturing
- 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st centuryFrese, Michael, Fay, Doris · 2001 · Research in Organizational Behavior
- Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis.Keith, Nina, Frese, Michael · 2008 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Procrastination: self-regulation in initiating aversive goals.Van Eerde, Wendelien · 2000 · Applied Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expertise in professional software design: A process study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.83.5.703
- The paper
- Sonnentag, S. (1998). Expertise in professional software design: A process study. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.83.5.703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.