Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes.

Michael K. Lindell, Christina J. Brandt·2000·Journal of Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.331

Cites (7)

  1. A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY1
    LAWSHE, C. H. · 1975 · Personnel Psychology
  2. Developmental sequence in small groups.
    Tuckman, Bruce W. · 1965 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
    James, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1984 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
    James, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1993 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  5. Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?
    Williams, Larry J., Cote, Joseph A., Buckley, M. Ronald · 1989 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  6. Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research
    Glick, William H. · 1985 · The Academy of Management Review
  7. A disagreement about within-group agreement: disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus
    Kozlowski, Steve W., Hattrup, Keith · 1992 · Journal of Applied Psychology

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.