The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance.
Abstract
Although evidence supports the unique contribution of task performance and contextual performance to overall evaluations, little is known about the relative contribution that specific dimensions of contextual performance make to overall performance judgments. This study evaluated the extent to which supervisors consider task and contextual performance by using relative weights (J. W. Johnson, 2000) to statistically describe the relative importance of specific dimensions of each type of performance to overall performance ratings. Within each of 8 job families in a large organization, each of 4 dimensions of contextual performance made not only a unique contribution but a relatively important contribution to the overall evaluation. Evidence also supports the adaptive performance dimension of handling work stress as an aspect of contextual performance and job-task conscientiousness as an aspect of both task and contextual performance.
Cites (2)
- Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance.Pulakos, Elaine D., Arad, Sharon, Donovan, Michelle A., Plamondon, Kevin E. · 2000 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performanceMacKenzie, Scott B, Podsakoff, Philip M, Fetter, Richard · 1991 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Cited by (11)
- TRAIT AND BEHAVIORAL THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP: AN INTEGRATION AND META‐ANALYTIC TEST OF THEIR RELATIVE VALIDITYDERUE, D. SCOTT, NAHRGANG, JENNIFER D., WELLMAN, NED, HUMPHREY, STEPHEN E. · 2011 · Personnel Psychology
- The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance.Ng, Thomas W. H., Feldman, Daniel C. · 2008 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Aging, adult development, and work motivationKanfer, Ruth, Ackerman, Phillip L. · 2004 · The Academy of Management Review
- History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational ResearchJohnson, Jeff W., Lebreton, James M. · 2004 · Organizational Research Methods
- A Meta‐Analysis of Voice and Its Promotive and Prohibitive Forms: Identification of Key Associations, Distinctions, and Future Research DirectionsChamberlin, Melissa, Newton, Daniel W., Lepine, Jeffery A. · 2017 · Personnel Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.984
- The paper
- Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.984
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.