Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.

Abstract

A sample of 349 college students completed an argument evaluation test (AET) in which they evaluated arguments concerning real-life situations. A separate regression analysis was conducted for each student predicting his or her evaluations of argument quality from an objective indicator of argument quality and the strength of his or her prior beliefs about the target propositions. The beta weight for objective argument quality was interpreted in this analysis as an indicator of the ability to evaluate objective argument quality independent of prior belief. Individual differences in this index were reliably linked to individual differences in cognitive ability and actively open-minded thinking dispositions. Further, actively openminded thinking predicted variance in AET performance even after individual differences in cognitive ability had been partialled out. Discussions of critical thinking in the educational and psychological literature consistently point to the importance of decontextualized reasoning styles that foster the tendency to evaluate arguments and evidence in a way that is not

Cites (147)

1. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
   Bloch, Maurice, Lave, Jean, Wenger, Etienne · 1994 · Man
2. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
   Cohen, Patricia, Cohen, Patricia, West, Stephen G., Aiken, Leona S. · 2014 · Psychology Press eBooks
3. The case for motivated reasoning.
   Kunda, Ziva · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Multiple regression in behavioral research
   Fred N. Kerlinger, Elazar J. Pedhazur · 1973 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
5. Untitled work
   1987 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
6. Unified theories of cognition
   1991 · Choice Reviews Online
7. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years; A Scheme
   William G. Perry · 1970
8. Measurement and Control of Response Bias
   Paulhus, Delroy L. · 1991 · Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes
9. Perspectives on socially shared cognition.
   1991 · American Psychological Association eBooks
10. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory
    Costa, Paul T., McCrae, Robert R. · 1992 · Psychological Assessment

Show all 147 references

Cited by (52)

1. Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
   Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. · 2008 · Annual Review of Psychology
2. Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate
   Evans, Jonathan St. B. T., Stanovich, Keith E. · 2013 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
3. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
   Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
4. The Affect Heuristic
   Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
5. Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities
   Helfat, Constance E., Peteraf, Margaret A. · 2015 · Strategic Management Journal

See all 729