Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors.

JANET TAYLOR SPENCE, Robert L. Helmreich, Carole Kovalic Holahan·1979·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Negatively valued masculinity (M-) and femininity (F-) personality scales were developed to supplement the positively valued Masculinity (M+) and Femininity (F+) scales of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ; Spence & Helmreich). M- consisted of traits that had been judged to be (a) more typical of males than females, (b) undesirable in both sexes, and (c ) agentic or instrumental in content. Two F- scales were developed, both containing stereotypically feminine, undesirable traits, one set of traits referring to communionlike characteristics (Fc-) and the other to verbal passive-aggressive qualities (FVA-). Significant sex differences in the predicted direction were found on all scales. In both sexes, low and typically nonsignificant correlations were found between parallel positive and negative scales, but highly significant negative correlations were found between positive and negative cross-sex scales. These findings provide additional evidence for the multidimentionslity of masculinity and femininity. Scores on a self-esteem measure were positively correlated with M+ and F+, uncorrelated with M-, and negatively correlated with the F- scales. Different patterns of scores were associated with two types of problem behaviors. In both sexes, neuroticism was most highly correlated (in a negative direction) with M+, and acting out behavoir was most strongly correlated (in a positive direction) with M-. The next highest correlation in both instances was with FVA-.

Cites (2)

  1. The measurement of psychological androgyny
    Bem, Sandra L. · 1974 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  2. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny
    Bem, Sandra Lipsitz · 1977 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Show all 2 references

Cited by (24)

  1. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
    Davis, Mark H. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.
    Glick, Peter, Fiske, Susan T. · 1996 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire
    Martin, Rod A., Puhlik-Doris, Patricia, Larsen, Gwen, Gray, Jeanette, Weir, Kelly · 2003 · Journal of Research in Personality
  4. What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't be, are Allowed to be, and don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes
    Prentice, Deborah A., Carranza, Erica · 2002 · Psychology of Women Quarterly
  5. Gender As a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism
    Risman, Barbara J. · 2004 · Gender & Society

See all 550

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.37.10.1673
The paper
SPENCE, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.37.10.1673

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.