Cited by 1,501Gender Roles and Identity StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesMedia, Gender, and Advertising

What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't be, are Allowed to be, and don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes

Prentice, Deborah A., Carranza, Erica·2002·Psychology of Women Quarterly

Abstract

This article presents a four-category framework to characterize the contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. The framework distinguishes between prescriptions and proscriptions that are intensified by virtue of one's gender, and those that are relaxed by virtue of one's gender. Two studies examined the utility of this framework for characterizing prescriptive gender stereotypes in American society (Study 1) and in the highly masculine context of Princeton University (Study 2). The results demonstrated the persistence of traditional gender prescriptions in both contexts, but also revealed distinct areas of societal vigilance and leeway for each gender. In addition, they showed that women are seen more positively, relative to societal standards, than are men. We consider the implications of this framework for research on reactions to gender stereotype deviants and sex discrimination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The binary conceptualization of gender functions prescriptively to specify what is desired of women and men and proscriptively by specifying what is not.

    “This binary conceptualization of gender functions prescriptively to specify what is desired of women and men and proscriptively by specifying what is not (Morgenroth & Ryan, 2021; Morgenroth et al., 2021; Prentice & Carranza, 2002).”

    From A Sexist Language? Gender Differences in Attitudes and Use of Gender-Inclusive Pronouns (2025) · cites this paper as Prentice & Carranza, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Published
2002-12
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
269-281
ISSN
  • 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6402
OpenAlex
W2157491892
Cited by
1,501
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 157 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 111 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 38
FWCI
11.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
gender roles, gender stereotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review