The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique.
Abstract
¿¿Mediante esta investigación se evaluó la relación existente entre la creatividad y el rendimiento académico, así como las diferencias del rendimiento académico en función del nivel de creatividad, para lo cual se tomó una muestra de 72 participantes de tercero, cuarto y quinto grado de primaria en una institución educativa con enfoque tradicional, a quienes se le aplicó la Adaptación al español del Test de Torrance. Las puntuaciones obtenidas fueron comparadas con las notas correspondientes a las materias de matemáticas, ciencias y lenguaje y a su vez se comparan los resultados de aquellos puntajes que indican alta creatividad frente a otros con puntuación media o baja. Los resultados y análisis permiten establecer que no hay relaciones significativas entre creatividad general y rendimiento académico, aunque si se pueden establecer relaciones entre el componente de originalidad con el rendimiento en matemáticas, español y el promedio, a la vez que se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los grupos, en lo concerniente al rendimiento académico.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Creativity is typically assessed across two dimensions: novelty and usefulness (11, 12).”
From Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“However, there is a consensus in social psychology that the evaluation of product creativity requires domain knowledge.”
From Playwriting with Large Language Models: Perceived Features, Interaction Strategies and Outcomes (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“The validity of the judgement is based on consensual agreement among experts [2].”
From Playwriting with Large Language Models: Perceived Features, Interaction Strategies and Outcomes (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“The most widely accepted framework evaluates innovation across two primary dimensions: novelty and usefulness (Amabile, 1982; Doshi and Hauser, 2024; Harvey and Berry, 2022).”
From AI-assisted design synthesis and human creativity in engineering education (2026) · cites this paper as Amabile, 1982
In the citing paper
“Consensus-based mechanisms that encourage sharing perspectives may improve agreement [Amabile 1982].”
From Peer and self assessment in massive online classes (2013) · cites this paper as Amabile 1982
3 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Citations
Cites
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 26,755
Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.
Deci, E. L. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030644 · Cited by 4,170
The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.
Amabile, T. M. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 · Cited by 4,034
Self-citationThe nature of human intelligence
Fuilford, J. P. (1967) · McGraw-Hill eBooks · Cited by 3,864
Torrance, E. P. (1962) · Prentice-Hall, Inc eBooks · doi:10.1037/13134-000 · Cited by 1,598
Guilford, J. P. (1956) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040755 · Cited by 1,508
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.451 · Cited by 1,186
The nature and nurture of creative talent.
Mackinnon, D. W. (1962) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0046541 · Cited by 992
A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List.
Gough, H. G. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.8.1398 · Cited by 954
Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior.
Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0021188 · Cited by 847
Cited by
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Self‐determination theory and work motivation
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.322 · Cited by 7,757
The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.
Amabile, T. M. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 · Cited by 4,034
Self-citationBeyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013688 · Cited by 2,669
The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations.
Amabile, T. M., Hemphill, S. A., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.950 · Cited by 1,892
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Amabile, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Brandeis University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Amabile, Teresa M.
- ORCID
- Amabile, Teresa M.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1982-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 997-1013
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2038333915
- Cited by
- 2,278
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 153 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 101 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 77
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Intellectum (Universidad de La Sabana) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Keywords
- creativity, academic performance, Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, originality, elementary school students, mathematics achievement, language achievement, social psychology of creativity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
- The paper
- Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
