Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis.
Abstract
Michael J. DonahueBrigham Young UniversityThe major findings of this meta-analytic review concerning intrinsic and extrinsicreligiousness are these: (a) Samples consisting of respondents with conservativetheological orientations seem more likely to display a negative correlation betweenintrinsic and extrinsic religiousness than do others, (b) Extrinsic religiousnesstends to be positively correlated with negatively evaluated characteristics, anduncorrelated with measures of religious belief and commitment, (c) Intrinsicreligiousness tends to be uncorrelated with negatively evaluated characteristics,and positively correlated with measures of religiousness, (d) A fourfold typologybased on median splits of the two scales is of little use when the dependentvariable is religious in nature, but with various nonreligious variables producesresults that may correspond to findings of curvilinearity observed with othermeasures of religiousness. Recommendations concerning the use of the intrinsicand extrinsic scales in future research are made. The article concludes with areview of recent conceptual developments by Batson (1976) and Hood (1978).No approach to religiousness has hadgreater impact on the empirical psychologyof religion than Gordon W. Allport's conceptsof intrinsic (7) and extrinsic (E) religiousness(Meadow & Kahoe, 1984).' Nearly 70 pub-lished studies have used Allport's ReligiousOrientation Scale (ROS), making it one ofthe most frequently used measures of reli-giousness.Research concerning / and E has beenreviewed in three current psychology-of-reli-gion textbooks (Batson & Ventis, 1982;Meadow & Kahoe, 1984; Paloutzian, 1983).Although these reviews are useful, they havenot closely examined a number of relevantissues, such as the I-E correlation and theI-E interaction. In addition to addressingthese issues, in the present review I seek toapply the techniques of meta-analysis (Glass,
Cites (6)
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin
- The measurement of psychological androgynyBem, Sandra L. · 1974 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- "From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior.Darley, John M., Batson, C. Daniel · 1973 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Greenwald, Anthony G. · 1975 · Psychological Bulletin
- A validated intrinsic religious motivation scaleHoge, R. · 1972 · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Conversion Experience, Belief System, and Personal and Ethical AttitudesPaloutzian, Raymond F., Jackson, Steven L., Crandall, James E. · 1978 · Journal of Psychology and Theology
Cited by (29)
- Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchersGignac, Gilles E., Szodorai, Eva T. · 2016 · Personality and Individual Differences
- Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research.Hill, Peter C., Pargament, Kenneth I. · 2003 · American Psychologist
- Meaning in the context of stress and copingPark, Crystal L., Folkman, Susan · 1997 · Review of General Psychology
- One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively DescribedRichard, F. D., Bond, Charles F., Stokes-Zoota, Juli J. · 2003 · Review of General Psychology
- On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysisPeterson, Robert A. · 2001 · Journal of Consumer Research
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.48.2.400
- The paper
- Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.48.2.400
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.