Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others.

Abstract

In a follow-up study to Dunning, Griffin, Milojkovic, and L. Ross (1990), which had investigated the phenomenon of overconfidence in social prediction, two samples of first-year undergraduates were invited to make predictions about their own future responses (and, in the case of Sample 2, also those of their roommates) over the months ahead. These predictions were accompanied by confidence estimates and were evaluated in the light of actual responses reported later by the subjects in question. The primary finding was that self-predictions, like social predictions, proved to be consistently overconfident. As in Dunning et al., moreover, overconfidence could be traced to two sources. First, expressions of particularly high confidence rarely proved to be warranted; as confidence increased, the gap between accuracy and confidence widened. Second, predictions that went against relevant base rates yielded very low accuracy in the face of relatively unattenuated confidence levels. The implications of these results are discussed, and one potentially important underlying mechanism--the failure to make adequate inferential allowance for the uncertainties of situational construal--is proposed for further research.

Cites (1)

1. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
   Klayman, Joshua, Ha, Young-won · 1987 · Psychological Review

Show all 1 references

Cited by (23)

1. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments
   Kruger, Justin, Dunning, David · 1999 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
   Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
3. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory.
   Nira Liberman, Yaacov Trope B · 1998 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
4. The Affect Heuristic
   Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
5. “Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
   Dawes, Robyn M., Faust, David, Meehl, Paul E. · 1989 · Science

See all 272