Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem.

Abstract

Four studies sought to differentiate between self-enhancement and self-protection as motivations self-handicapping. High-self-esteem participants self-handicapped to enhance success, whereas low-self-esteem participants self-handicapped to protect against the esteem-threatening implications of failure. This was supported with 2 different forms of self-handicapping and corroborated by attributional statements regarding the implications of handicaps for performance outcomes

Cites (1)

1. Responses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions.
   Shrauger, J. Sidney · 1975 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 1 references

Cited by (25)

1. Bad Is Stronger Than Good
   Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin, Vohs, Kathleen D. · 2001 · Review of General Psychology
2. The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory
   Leary, Mark R., Baumeister, Roy F. · 2000 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
3. Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem.
   Baumeister, Roy F., Smart, Laura, Boden, Joseph M. · 1996 · Psychological Review
4. Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?
   Heine, Steven J., Lehman, Darrin R., Markus, Hazel Rose, Kitayama, Shinobu · 1999 · Psychological Review
5. Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns.
   Muraven, Mark, Tice, Dianne M., Baumeister, Roy F. · 1998 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 359