Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings.
Abstract
For years, affect researchers have debated about the true dimensionality of mood. Some have argued that positive and negative moods are largely independent and can be experienced simultaneously. Others claim that mood is bipolar, that joy and sorrow represent opposite ends of a single dimension. The 3 studies presented in this article suggest that the evidence that purportedly shows the independence of seemingly opposite mood states, that is, low correlations between positive and negative moods, may be the result of failures to consider biases due to random and nonrandom response error. When these sources of error are taken into account using multiple methods of mood assessment, a largely bipolar structure for affect emerges. The data herein speak to the importance of a multi-method approach to the measurement of mood.
Cites (48)
- Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Watson, David, Clark, Lee Anna, Tellegen, Auke · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Structural Equations with Latent Variables.Clogg, Clifford C., Bollen, Kenneth A. · 1991 · Contemporary Sociology
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin
- The Measurement of MeaningCharles E. Osgood, George J. Suci, Percy H. Tannenbaum · 1957
- Взаимосвязь статуса занятости и пола с уровнем психологического благополучияНиводничева М.Р., Беляева С.И. · 2026 · Cifra LLC Journals
- The Structure of Psychological Well-Being.Mechanic, David, Bradburn, Norman M. · 1970 · American Sociological Review
- Review of personality and social psychologyLadd S. Wheeler, Phillip R. Shaver · 1980 · UMI Books on Demand
- Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy peopleCosta, Paul T., McCrae, Robert R. · 1980 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- The independence of positive and negative affect.Ed Diener, Robert A. Emmons · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Cluster Analysis. Sage University Paper Series On Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-044Mark S. Aldenderfer, Roger K. Blashfield · 1984
Cited by (43)
- The structure of psychological well-being revisited.Ryff, Carol D., Keyes, Corey Lee M. · 1995 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.Clark, Lee Anna, Watson, David · 1995 · Psychological Assessment
- The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.Glick, Peter, Fiske, Susan T. · 1996 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- The Role of Emotions in MarketingBagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., Nyer, P. U. · 1999 · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
- Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions.Keyes, Corey L. M., Shmotkin, Dov, Ryff, Carol D. · 2002 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.1029
- The paper
- GREEN, D. P., Goldman, S. L., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.1029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.