Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making.

Deborah H. Gruenfeld·1995·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Prior studies of integrative complexity indicate that political conservatives tend to interpret policy issues in less complex ways than do liberals and moderates. However, ideological preference in that work was systematically confounded with decision makers' status in the groups to which they belonged. The study reported here varied both factors independently in a content analysis of Supreme Court opinions. In contrast to previous conclusions, results supported a status-contingency model, which predicts higher levels of complexity among members of majority factions than among members of either minority factions or unanimous groups independently of the ideological content of their views

Cites (2)

  1. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
    Asch, Solomon E. · 1956 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
  2. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior
    Easterbrook, J. A. · 1959 · Psychological Review

Show all 2 references

Cited by (8)

  1. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
    Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., Sulloway, Frank J. · 2003 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Power, approach, and inhibition.
    Keltner, Dacher, Gruenfeld, Deborah H., Anderson, Cameron · 2003 · Psychological Review
  3. Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups
    Jehn, Karen A., Northcraft, Gregory B., Neale, Margaret A. · 1999 · Administrative Science Quarterly
  4. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
    Hinsz, Verlin B., Tindale, R. Scott, Vollrath, David A. · 1997 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis.
    Malka, Ariel, Soto, Christopher J., Inzlicht, Michael, Lelkes, Yphtach · 2014 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 282

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.5
The paper
Gruenfeld, D. H. (1995). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.