Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence.

Carli, Linda L., LaFleur, Suzanne J., Loeber, Christopher C.·1995·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Participants viewed a videotape of either a male or female confederate delivering a persuasive message using a high task, social, submissive, or dominant nonverbal style. Participants were influenced more after viewing the social and task styles than the dominant or submissive styles. Participants liked task and social confederates more than dominant confederates and considered submissive confederates to be less competent than the other 3 styles. Although both likableness and competence were predictive of influence, likableness was a more important determinant of influence for female than male speakers when the audience was male. Consequently, with a male audience, women exhibiting a task style were less influential and likable than men exhibiting that style. Men were not more influential than women when displaying dominance

Cites (62)

  1. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
    Baron, Reuben M., Kenny, David A. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. The Bases of Social Power
    FRENCH, J. R. P., RAVEN, B. · 1986 · Political Leadership
  3. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis.
    Alice H. Eagly, Mona G. Makhijani, Bruce G. Klonsky · 1992 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. Cognitive Responses in Persuasion
    2014 · Psychology Press eBooks
  5. Research design and statistical analysis
    2011 · Choice Reviews Online
  6. Studies in social power
    Dorwin Cartwright · 1959 · Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College)
  7. Status Organizing Processes
    Berger, Joseph, Rosenholtz, Susan J., Zelditch, Morris · 1980 · Annual Review of Sociology
  8. Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts.
    Yukl, Gary, Falbe, Cecilia M. · 1990 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  9. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach.
    III, Louie Miller, Berger, Joseph, Fisek, M. Hamit, Norman, Robert Z., Zelditch, Morris · 1977 · Social Forces
  10. Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication.
    Veevers, J. E., Henley, Nancy M. · 1979 · Contemporary Sociology

Show all 62 references

Cited by (21)

  1. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
    Eagly, Alice H., Karau, Steven J. · 2002 · Psychological Review
  2. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.
    Rudman, Laurie A. · 1998 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks.
    Heilman, Madeline E., Wallen, Aaron S., Fuchs, Daniella, Tamkins, Melinda M. · 2004 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. Gender, Status, and Leadership
    Ridgeway, Cecilia L. · 2001 · Journal of Social Issues
  5. Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.
    Anderson, Cameron, Hildreth, John Angus D., Howland, Laura · 2015 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 323

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.68.6.1030
The paper
Carli, L. L., LaFleur, S. J., & Loeber, C. C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.6.1030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.