Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation.
Abstract
Despite the empirical robustness of the 5-factor model of personality, recent confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) of NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) data suggest they do not fit the hypothesized model. In a replication study of 229 adults, a series ofCFAs showed that Revised NEO-PI scales are not simple-structured but do approximate the normative 5-factor structure. CFA goodness-of-fit indices, however, were not high. Comparability analyses showed that no more than 5 factors were replicable, which calls into question some assumptions underlying the use of CFA. An alternative method that uses targeted rotation was presented and illustrated with data from Chinese and Japanese versions of the Revised NEO-PI that clearly replicated the 5-factor structure.
Cites (6)
- Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitBrowne, Michael W., Cudeck, Robert · 1992 · Sociological Methods & Research
- Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.P. M. Bentler, Douglas G. Bonett · 1980 · Psychological Bulletin
- Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T. · 1987 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- The earth is round (p < .05).Cohen, Jacob · 1994 · American Psychologist
- Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns.Guadagnoli, Edward, Velicer, Wayne F. · 1988 · Psychological Bulletin
- Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlationsVelicer, Wayne F. · 1976 · Psychometrika
Cited by (50)
- Personality trait structure as a human universal.McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T. · 1997 · American Psychologist
- Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation StudyGelfand, Michele J., Raver, Jana L., Nishii, Lisa, Leslie, Lisa M., Lun, Janetta, Lim, Beng Chong, Duan, Lili, Almaliach, Assaf, Ang, Soon, Arnadottir, Jakobina et al. · 2011 · Science
- The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality.Donnellan, M. Brent, Oswald, Frederick L., Baird, Brendan M., Lucas, Richard E. · 2006 · Psychological Assessment
- Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A Brief Measure of Dark Personality TraitsJones, Daniel N., Paulhus, Delroy L. · 2014 · Assessment
- Trait emotional intelligence: psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomiesPetrides, K V, Furnham, Adrian · 2001 · European Journal of Personality
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.552
- The paper
- McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Bond, M. H. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.