What the Need for Closure Scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives.

Abstract

The Need for Closure Scale (NFCS; D. M. Webster & A. W. Kruglanski, 1994) was introduced to assess the extent to which a person, faced with a decision o r judgment, desires any answer, as compared with confusion and ambiguity. The NFCS was presented as being unidimensional and as having adequate discriminant validity. Our data contradict these conceptual and psychometric claims. As a unidimensional scale, the NFCS is redundant with the Personal Need for Structure Scale (PNS; M. M. Thompson, M. E. Naccarato, & K. E. Parker, 1989). When the NFCS is used more appropriately as a multidimensional instrument, 3 of its facets are redundant with the PNS Scale, and a 4th is redundant with the Personal Fear of Invalidity Scale (M. M. Thompson et al., 1989). It is suggested that the NFCS masks important distinctions between 2 independent epistemic motives: the preference for quick, decisive answers (nonspecific closure) and the need to create and maintain simple structures (one form o f specific closure).

Cites (8)

1. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
   McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T. · 1987 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2. “The Need for Cognition.”
   Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E. · 1982 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition.
   Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E., Feinstein, Jeffrey A., Jarvis, W. Blair G. · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.
   Webster, Donna M., Kruglanski, Arie W. · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”
   Kruglanski, Arie W., Webster, Donna M. · 1996 · Psychological Review
6. The correspondence bias.
   Gilbert, Daniel T., Malone, Patrick S. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
7. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion.
   Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
8. Limitations of Coefficient Alpha as an Index of Test Unidimensionality1
   Green, Samuel B., Lissitz, Robert W., Mulaik, Stanlen A. · 1977 · Educational and Psychological Measurement

Show all 8 references

Cited by (13)

1. Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Psychological Research
   MacCallum, Robert C., Austin, James T. · 2000 · Annual Review of Psychology
2. Social Identity Complexity
   Roccas, Sonia, Brewer, Marilynn B. · 2002 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
3. Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making
   De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Nijstad, Bernard A., van Knippenberg, Daan · 2008 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
4. Modeling General and Specific Variance in Multifaceted Constructs: A Comparison of the Bifactor Model to Other Approaches
   Chen, Fang Fang, Hayes, Adele, Carver, Charles S., Laurenceau, Jean‐Philippe, Zhang, Zugui · 2012 · Journal of Personality
5. The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction
   Wegener, Duane T., Petty, Richard E. · 1997 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

See all 287