Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self.

Abstract

The authors propose that superstars are most likely to affect self-views when they are considered relevant. Relevant superstars provoke self-enhancement and inspiration when their success seems attainable but self-deflation when it seems unattainable. Participants ' elf-views were affected only when the star's domain of excellence was self-relevant. Relevant stars provoked self-enhancement and inspiration when their success eemed attainable in that participants either still had enough time to achieve comparable success or believed their own abilities could improve over time. Open-ended responses provided rich evidence of inspiration in these circumstances. Relevant stars provoked, if anything, self-deflation when their success eemed unattainable in that participants either had already missed the chance to achieve comparable success or viewed their abilities as fixed and so unlikely to improve. It is a cultural clich6 that superstars, that is, individuals of outstanding achievement, can serve as role models to others, inspiring and motivating them to do their utmost best. To pro-mote such inspiration, prominent women scientists are often invited to address high school girls, eminent African Americans

Cites (11)

1. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
   Baron, Reuben M., Kenny, David A. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
   Markus, Hazel R., Kitayama, Shinobu · 1991 · Psychological Review
3. A theory of social comparison processes
   Festinger, Leon · 1954 · Human Relations
4. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
   Dweck, Carol S., Leggett, Ellen L. · 1988 · Psychological Review
5. The case for motivated reasoning.
   Kunda, Ziva · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
6. Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.
   Brewer, Marilynn B., Gardner, Wendi · 1996 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
7. Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies.
   Cialdini, Robert B., Borden, Richard J., Thorne, Avril, Walker, Marcus Randall, Freeman, Stephen, Sloan, Lloyd Reynolds · 1976 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
8. Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes
   Wood, Joanne V. · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
9. Toward a self‐evaluation maintenance model of social behavior
   Tesser, Abraham · 1988 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
10. For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations
    Collins, Rebecca L. · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 11 references

Cited by (63)

1. The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory
   Sherman, David K., Cohen, Geoffrey L. · 2006 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
2. Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem.
   Vogel, Erin A., Rose, Jason P., Roberts, Lindsay R., Eckles, Katheryn · 2014 · Psychology of Popular Media Culture
3. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science
   Cheryan, Sapna, Plaut, Victoria C., Davies, Paul G., Steele, Claude M. · 2009 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
4. Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
   Cheryan, Sapna, Ziegler, Sianna A., Montoya, Amanda K., Jiang, Lily · 2017 · Psychological Bulletin
5. STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
   Stout, Jane G., Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Hunsinger, Matthew, McManus, Melissa A. · 2011 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 1,585