Cited by 420Behavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The cognitive impact of past behavior: Influences on beliefs, attitudes and future behavioral decisions

Open access
Albarracín, Dolores, Wyer, Robert S.·2000·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

To study the processes by which past behavior influences future behavior, participants were led to believe that without being aware of it, they had expressed either support for or opposition to the institution of comprehensive exams. Judgment and response time data suggested that participants' perceptions of their past behavior often influenced their decisions to repeat the behavior. This influence was partly the result of cognitive activity that influenced participants' cognitions about specific behavioral consequences and the attitude they based on these cognitions. More generally, however, feedback about past behavior had a direct effect on participants' attitudes and ultimate behavioral decisions that was independent of the outcome-specific cognitions. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for biased scanning of memory, dissonance reduction, self-perception, and the use of behavior as a heuristic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some past experiences predict sanguinity in decision-making.

    “some past experiences predict sanguinity in decision-making (Albarracin & Wyer, 2000) and in close relationships (Carnelley & Janoff-Bulman, 1992).”

    From To Nostalgize (2015) · cites this paper as Albarracin & Wyer, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albarracín, D., & Wyer, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2000
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
5-22
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4229560905
Cited by
420
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh052616-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH01861, R03MH058073, K01MH001861, R03-MH58073, R01-MH52616)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
past behavior, cognitive impact, belief, attitudes, future behavior, self-perception, self-concept
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Choice Behavior, Cognitive Dissonance, Female, Humans, Knowledge of Results, Psychological, Male, Models, Psychological, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review