Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?
Abstract
Recent interest in the implicit self-esteem construct has led to the creation and use of several new assessment tools whose psychometric properties have not been fully explored. In this article, the authors investigated the reliability and validity of seven implicit self-esteem measures. The different implicit measures did not correlate with each other, and they correlated only weakly with measures of explicit self-esteem. Only some of the implicit measures demonstrated good test-retest reliabilities, and overall, the implicit measures were limited in their ability to predict our criterion variables. Finally, there was some evidence that implicit self-esteem measures are sensitive to context. The implications of these findings for the future of implicit self-esteem research are discussed.
Cites (9)
- Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Watson, David, Clark, Lee Anna, Tellegen, Auke · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Society and the Adolescent Self-ImageRosenberg, Morris · 1965
- Studies of interference in serial verbal reactionsStroop, J. R. · 1935 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental healthTaylor, Shelley E., Brown, Jonathon D. · 1988 · Psychological Bulletin
- Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypesGreenwald, Anthony G., Banaji, Mahzarin R. · 1995 · Psychological Review
- Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconsciousEpstein, Seymour · 1994 · American Psychologist
- Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-conceptGreenwald, Anthony G., Farnham, Shelly D. · 2000 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Self-linking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: Initial validation of a measureTafarodi, Romin W., Swann Jr., William B. · 1995 · Journal of Personality Assessment
- Cognition and Psychotherapy1985
Cited by (59)
- Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?Buhrmester, Michael, Kwang, Tracy, Gosling, Samuel D. · 2011 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.Greenwald, Anthony G., Poehlman, T. Andrew, Uhlmann, Eric Luis, Banaji, Mahzarin R. · 2009 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our SelvesPennebaker, James W., Mehl, Matthias R., Niederhoffer, Kate G. · 2003 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.Sowislo, Julia Friederike, Orth, Ulrich · 2013 · Psychological Bulletin
- Untitled work2003 · 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.631
- The paper
- Bosson, J. K., Jr. Swann William, B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.631
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.