Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined.

Marques, José, Abrams, Dominic, Serôdio, Rui G.·2001·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The authors predicted that derogation of group deviants depends on the extent to which in-group norms or values are validated or undermined in a social context. In Experiment 1 participants were less tolerant and derogated in-group deviants more when other in-group members opposed the norm. In Experiment 2 participants derogated in-group deviants more than out-group deviants and than noncategorized individuals, but only when normative in-group members lacked uniformity. In Experiment 3 participants derogated in-group deviants more when there was uncertainty about in-group superiority. These results are consistent with previous research on the black sheep effect (J. M. Marques, V. Y. Yzerbyt, & J. -P. Leyens, 1988) and with the model of subjective group dynamics (D. Abrams, J. M. Marques, N. J. Bown, & M. Henson, 2000; J. M. Marques, D. Abrams, D. Paez, & C. Martinez-Taboada, 1998).

Cites (6)

  1. Social psychology of intergroup relations
    Tajfel, H · 1982 · Annual Review of Psychology
  2. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
    Deutsch, Morton, Gerard, Harold B. · 1955 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
  3. A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior
    Cialdini, Robert B., Kallgren, Carl A., Reno, Raymond R. · 1991 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  4. Social Pressures in Informal Groups
    Festinger, Leon, Schachter, Stanley, Back, Kurt · 1950 · The American Catholic Sociological Review
  5. Deviation, rejection and communication
    Schachter, Stanley · 1951 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
  6. In-Group or Out-Group Extemity: Importance of the Threatened Social Identity
    Branscombe, Nyla R., Wann, Daniel L, Noel, Jeffrey G., Coleman, Jason · 1993 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Show all 6 references

Cited by (9)

  1. Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms
    Hogg, Michael A., Reid, Scott A. · 2006 · Communication Theory
  2. Uncertainty–identity theory
    Hogg, Michael A. · 2007 · Advances in experimental social psychology
  3. How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: negative group members and dysfunctional groups
    Felps, Will, Mitchell, Terence R., Byington, Eliza · 2006 · Research in Organizational Behavior
  4. The Red Sneakers Effect: Inferring Status and Competence from Signals of Nonconformity
    Bellezza, Silvia, Gino, Francesca, Keinan, Anat · 2014 · Journal of Consumer Research
  5. So Right It's Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision Making
    Baron, Robert S. · 2005 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

See all 408

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.436
The paper
Marques, J., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.436

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.