Cited by 991Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Uncertainty–identity theory

Hogg, Michael A.·2007·Advances in experimental social psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39002-8

Cites

259 of 259 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 269 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogg, M. A.
Affiliations
Claremont Graduate University (US)
Corresponding author
Hogg, Michael A.
Venue
Advances in experimental social psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2007
Pages
69-126
ISSN
0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1607345844
Cited by
990
References
269
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 25
FWCI
88.52
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
uncertainty-identity theory, uncertainty reduction, social identity theory, group identification, entitativity, extremism, fanaticism, true believers, ideology, postmodern society, religious extremism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review