Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined.
Marques, José, Abrams, Dominic, Serôdio, Rui G.·2001·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (9)
- Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group NormsHogg, Michael A., Reid, Scott A. · 2006 · Communication Theory
- Uncertainty–identity theoryHogg, Michael A. · 2007 · Advances in experimental social psychology
- How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: negative group members and dysfunctional groupsFelps, Will, Mitchell, Terence R., Byington, Eliza · 2006 · Research in Organizational Behavior
- The Red Sneakers Effect: Inferring Status and Competence from Signals of NonconformityBellezza, Silvia, Gino, Francesca, Keinan, Anat · 2014 · Journal of Consumer Research
- So Right It's Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision MakingBaron, Robert S. · 2005 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Belief in conspiracy theories and intentions to engage in everyday crimeJolley, Daniel, Douglas, Karen M., Leite, Ana C., Schrader, Tanya · 2019 · British Journal of Social Psychology
- The Many Ways to Be Marginal in a GroupEllemers, Naomi, Jetten, Jolanda · 2013 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Influence and LeadershipHogg, Michael A. · 2010 · Handbook of Social Psychology
- Loyal peripherals? The interactive effects of identification and peripheral group membership on deviance from non‐beneficial ingroup normsMasson, Torsten, Fritsche, Immo · 2019 · European Journal of Social Psychology
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.