Religion and the morality of mentality.

Abstract

Christian doctrine considers mental states important in judging a person's moral status, whereas Jewish doctrine considers them less important. The authors provide evidence from 4 studies that American Jews and Protestants differ in the moral import they attribute to mental states (honoring one's parents, thinking about having a sexual affair, and thinking about harming an animal). Although Protestants and Jews rated the moral status of the actions equally. Protestants rated a target person with inappropriate mental states more negatively than did Jews. These differences in moral judgment were partially mediated by Protestants' beliefs that mental states are controllable and likely to lead to action and were strongly related to agreement with general statements claiming that thoughts are morally relevant. These religious differences were not related to differences in collectivistic (interdependent) and individualistic (independent) tendencies.

Cites (35)

1. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
   Markus, Hazel R., Kitayama, Shinobu · 1991 · Psychological Review
2. Individualism and Collectivism
   1976 · The Road to Serfdom
3. Individualism and collectivism
   Oetzel, John G. · 1996 · International Journal of Intercultural Relations
4. The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals
   Singelis, Theodore M. · 1994 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
5. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion
   Knudten, Richard D., Berger, Peter · 1968 · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
6. Cultural Models in Language and Thought
   1987 · Cambridge University Press eBooks
7. Paradoxical effects of thought suppression.
   Wegner, Daniel M., Schneider, David J., Carter, Samuel R., White, Teri L. · 1987 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
8. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
   Jonathan Haidt, Sílvia Helena Koller, Maria G. Dias · 1993 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
9. The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.
   Tetlock, Philip E., Kristel, Orie V., Elson, S. Beth, Green, Melanie C., Lerner, Jennifer S. · 2000 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
10. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach
    Donahue, Michael J., Hood, Ralph W., Spilka, Bernard, Hunsberger, Bruce, Gorsuch, Richard · 1998 · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Show all 35 references

Cited by (14)

1. Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution
   Markus, Hazel Rose, Kitayama, Shinobu · 2010 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
2. Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications.
   McCullough, Michael E., Willoughby, Brian L. B. · 2009 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know?
   Norenzayan, Ara, Heine, Steven J. · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion
   Atran, Scott, Norenzayan, Ara · 2004 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
5. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm
   Schein, Chelsea, Gray, Kurt · 2018 · Personality and Social Psychology Review

See all 306