Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.

Kevin M. Carlsmith, John M. Darley, Paul H. Robinson·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

One popular justification for punishment is the just deserts rationale: A person deserves punishment proportionate to the moral wrong committed. A competing justification is the deterrence rationale: Punishing an offender reduces the frequency and likelihood of future offenses. The authors examined the motivation underlying laypeople's use of punishment for prototypical wrongs. Study 1 (N = 336) revealed high sensitivity to factors uniquely associated with the just deserts perspective (e.g., offense seriousness, moral trespass) and insensitivity to factors associated with deterrence (e.g., likelihood of detection, offense frequency). Study 2 (N = 329) confirmed the proposed model through structural equation modeling (SEM). Study 3 (N = 351) revealed that despite strongly stated preferences for deterrence theory, individual sentencing decisions seemed driven exclusively by just deserts concerns.

Cites (5)

  1. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
    Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos · 1979 · Econometrica
  2. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
    Browne, Michael W., Cudeck, Robert · 1992 · Sociological Methods & Research
  3. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1981 · Science
  4. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
    Nisbett, Richard E., Wilson, Timothy D. · 1977 · Psychological Review
  5. Why People Obey the Law
    Tyler, Tom R. · 2006

Show all 5 references

Cited by (14)

  1. Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation
    Tyler, Tom R. · 2006 · Annual Review of Psychology
  2. Normative foundations of human cooperation
    Fehr, Ernst, Schurtenberger, Ivo · 2018 · Nature Human Behaviour
  3. Beyond point-and-shoot morality: why cognitive (neuro)science matters for ethics
    Greene, Joshua D. · 2014 · Ethics
  4. Vicarious retribution: the role of collective blame in intergroup aggression
    Lickel, Brian, Miller, Norman, Stenstrom, Douglas M., Denson, Thomas F., Schmader, Toni · 2006 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  5. The Moral Psychology Handbook
    Doris, John M., The Moral Psychology Research Group · 2010

See all 1,050

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.284
The paper
Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.284

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.