Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory.
Abstract
A large body of evidence indicates that women are more likely than men to show unipolar depression. Five classes of explanations for these sex differences are examined and the evidence for each class is reviewed. Not one of these explanations adequately accounts for the magnitude of the sex differences in depression. Finally, a response set explanation for the sex differences in depression is proposed. According to this explanation, men are more likely to engage in distracting behaviors that dampen their mood when depressed, but women are more likely to amplify their moods by ruminating about their depressed states and the possible causes of these states. Regardless of the initial source of a depressive episode (i.e., biological or psychological) men's more active responses to their negative moods may be more adaptive on average than women's less active, more ruminative responses. The epidemiology of a disorder can provide important clues to its etiology. When a disorder only strikes persons from one geographical region, one social class, or one gender, we can ask what characteristics of the vulnerable group might be making its members vulnerable. A frequent finding in epidemiological studies of mental disorders
Cites (7)
- The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General PopulationRadloff, Lenore Sawyer · 1977 · Applied Psychological Measurement
- A self-rating depression scaleZUNG, WILLIAM W. K. · 1965 · Archives of General Psychiatry
- Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Abramson, Lyn Y., Seligman, Martin E., Teasdale, John D. · 1978 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its History, Characteristics, and ValidityRobins, Lee N. · 1981 · Archives of General Psychiatry
- Mood and memoryBower, Gordon H. · 1981 · American Psychologist
- Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.Smith, Mary L., Glass, Gene V. · 1977 · American Psychologist
- Negative thinking in depression: cause, effect, or reciprocal relationship?Teasdale, John D · 1983 · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy
Cited by (157)
- Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.Gross, James J., John, Oliver P. · 2003 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Human agency in social cognitive theory.Bandura, Albert · 1989 · American Psychologist
- The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.Sullivan, Michael J. L., Bishop, Scott R., Pivik, Jayne · 1995 · Psychological Assessment
- The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Self-CompassionNEFF, KRISTIN D. · 2003 · Self and Identity
- Rethinking ruminationNolen-Hoeksema, Susan, Wisco, Blair E., Lyubomirsky, Sonja · 2008 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.101.2.259
- The paper
- Nolen–Hoeksema, S. (1987). Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.101.2.259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.