Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance.

Abstract

This study investigated the utility of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) models for testing the comparability of psychological measurements. Both procedures were used to investigate whether mood ratings collected in Minnesota and China were comparable. Several issues were addressed. The first issue was that of establishing a common measurement scale across groups, which involves full or partial measurement invariance of trait indicators. It is shown that using CFA or IRT models, test items that function differentially as trait indicators across groups need not interfere with comparing examinees on the same trait dimension. Second, the issue of model fit was addressed. It is proposed that person-fit statistics be used to judge the practical fit of IRT models. Finally, topics for future research are suggested.

Cites (5)

1. Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
   Bentler, P. M. · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
   P. M. Bentler, Douglas G. Bonett · 1980 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Back-translation for cross-cultural research.
   Brislin, Richard W. · 1970 · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
4. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance.
   Byrne, Barbara M., Shavelson, Richard J., Muthén, Bengt · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
5. Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations
   Jöreskog, K. G. · 1971 · Psychometrika

Show all 5 references

Cited by (59)

1. Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
   Cheung, Gordon W., Rensvold, Roger B. · 2002 · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
2. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research
   Vandenberg, Robert J., Lance, Charles E. · 2000 · Organizational Research Methods
3. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization
   1995 · Social Science & Medicine
4. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
   Clark, Lee Anna, Watson, David · 1995 · Psychological Assessment
5. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer
   Boateng, Godfred O., Neilands, Torsten B., Frongillo, Edward A., Melgar-Quiñonez, Hugo R., Young, Sera L. · 2018 · Frontiers in Public Health

See all 1,224