Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision.
Abstract
"Subitizing," the process of enumeration when there are fewer than 4 items, is rapid (40-100 ms/item), effortless, and accurate. "Counting," the process of enumeration when there are more than 4 items, is slow (250-350 ms/item), effortful, and error-prone. Why is there a difference in the way the small and large numbers of items are enumerated? A theory of enumeration is proposed that emerges from a general theory of vision, yet explains the numeric abilities of preverbal infants, children, and adults. We argue that subitizing exploits a limited-capacity parallel mechanism for item individuation, the FINST mechanism, associated with the multiple target tracking task (Pylyshyn, 1989; Pylyshyn & Storm, 1988). Two kinds of evidence support the claim that subitizing relies on preattentive information, whereas counting requires spatial attention. First, whenever spatial attention is needed to compute a spatial relation (cf. Ullman, 1984) or to perform feature integration (cf. Treisman & Gelade, 1980), subitizing does not occur (Trick & Pylyshyn, 1993a). Second, the position of the attentional focus, as manipulated by cue validity, has a greater effect on counting than subitizing latencies (Trick & Pylyshyn, 1993b).
Cites (4)
- Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perceptionNavon, David · 1977 · Cognitive Psychology
- Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Jeremy M. Wolfe, Kyle R. Cave, Susan L. Franzel · 1989 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens modelEriksen, Charles W., St. James, James D. · 1986 · Perception & Psychophysics
- Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.LaBerge, David · 1983 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Cited by (16)
- The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacityCowan, Nelson · 2001 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Action video game modifies visual selective attentionGreen, C. Shawn, Bavelier, Daphne · 2003 · Nature
- Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like statesApperly, Ian A., Butterfill, Stephen A. · 2009 · Psychological Review
- Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processingRousselle, Laurence, Noël, Marie-Pascale · 2007 · Cognition
- 19 The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture‐Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even ModulesHaidt, Jonathan, Joseph, Craig · 2008 · The Innate Mind, Volume 3
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.101.1.80
- The paper
- Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.101.1.80
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.