Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.

Abstract

The notion that inhibitory processes play a critical role in selective attention has gained wide support. Much of this support derives from studies of negative priming. The authors note that the attribution of negative priming to an inhibitory mechanism of attention draws its support from a common assumption underlying priming procedures, together with the procedure that has been used to measure negative priming. The results from a series of experiments demonstrate that selection between 2 competing prime items is not required to observe negative priming. This result is demonstrated across several experiments in which participants named 1 of 2 items in a second display following presentation of a single-item prime. The implications of these results for existing theories of negative priming are discussed, and a theoretical framework for interpreting negative priming and several related phenomena is forwarded.

Cites (3)

1. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
   Stroop, J. R. · 1935 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
2. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
   Eriksen, Barbara A., Eriksen, Charles W. · 1974 · Perception & Psychophysics
3. Toward an instance theory of automatization.
   Logan, Gordon D. · 1988 · Psychological Review

Show all 3 references

Cited by (8)

1. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis.
   Friedman, Naomi P., Miyake, Akira · 2004 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
2. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy.
   Nigg, Joel T. · 2000 · Psychological Bulletin
3. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
   Kane, Michael J., Bleckley, M. Kathryn, Conway, Andrew R. A., Engle, Randall W. · 2001 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
4. Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation
   Long, Debra L., Prat, Chantel S. · 2002 · Memory & Cognition
5. Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does
   Pinto, Yaïr, Olivers, Christiann L., Theeuwes, Jan · 2005 · Perception & Psychophysics

See all 325