The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Abstract
This article presents a theory in which automatization is construed as the acquisition of a domainspeciSc knowledge base, formed of separate representations, instances, of each exposure to the task. Processing is considered automatic if it relies on retrieval of stored instances, which will occur only after practice in a consistent environment. Practice is important because it increases the amount retrieved and the speed of retrieval; consistency is important because it ensures that the retrieved instances will be useful. The theory accounts quantitatively for the power-function speed-up and predicts a power-function reduction in the standard deviation that is constrained to have the same exponent as the power function for the speed-up. The theory accounts for qualitative properties as well, explaining how some may disappear and others appear with practice. More generally, it provides an alternative to the modal view of automaticity, arguing that novice performance is limited by a lack of knowledge rather than a scarcity of resources. The focus on learning avoids many problems with the modal view that stem from its focus on resource limitations. Automaticity is an important phenomenon in everyday mental life. Most of us recognize that we perform routine activities quickly and effortlessly, with little thought and conscious awareness—in short, automatically (James, 1890). As a result, we often perform those activities on "automatic pilot " and turn our minds to other things. F…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In strengthening, KCs become more accessible with repeated use, resulting in faster and more reliable retrieval of KCs.”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Logan, 1988
In the citing paper
“Two principle processes underlying fluency gains are knowledge compilation (e.g., Anderson & Lebiere, 1998) and memory strengthening (e.g., Logan, 1988).”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Logan, 1988
In the citing paper
“The race model suggests a single-stage model, theorizing that skill acquisition is solely driven by the continuous amassing of instances, which corresponds to a quantitative (rather than a qualitative) change in the mechanism.”
From Testing the three-stage model of second language skill acquisition (2025) · cites this paper as Logan, 1988
In the citing paper
“yet competing theoretical models with fewer stages also exist”
From Testing the three-stage model of second language skill acquisition (2025) · cites this paper as Logan, 1988
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0031333 · Cited by 1,751
A THEORY OF THE ACQUISITION OF SPEED-SKILL∗
CROSSMAN, E. R. F. W. (1959) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140135908930419 · Cited by 517
Hintzman, D. L. (1976) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60464-8 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 · Cited by 3,984
Ironic processes of mental control.
Wegner, D. M. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.101.1.34 · Cited by 2,609
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, G. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Logan, Gordon D.
- ORCID
- Logan, Gordon D.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 492-527
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2073371272
- Cited by
- 3,466
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 156 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 111 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 130 · 2013: 107 · 2012: 134
- FWCI
- 37.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- automation, automaticity, domain knowledge base, practice, consistency, retrieval speed, standard deviation reduction, skill acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward an instance theory of automatization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492
- The paper
- Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492