The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective.

Earl B. Hunt, Franca Agnoli·1991·Psychological Review

Abstract

The linguistic relativity (Whorfian) hypothesis states that language influences thought. In its strongest form, the hypothesis states that language controls both thought and perception. Several experiments have shown that this is false. The weaker form of the hypothesis, which states that language influences thought, has been held to be so vague that it is unprovable. The argument presented herein is that the weaker Whorfian hypothesis can be quantified and thus evaluated. Models of cognition developed after Whorf 's day indicate ways in which thought can be influenced by cultural variations in the lexical, syntactical, semantic, and pragmatic aspects of language. Although much research remains to be done, there appears to be a great deal of truth to the linguistic relativity hypothesis. In many ways the language people speak is a guide to the language in which they think.

Cites (77)

  1. A Mathematical Theory of Communication
    Shannon, C. E. · 1948 · Bell System Technical Journal
  2. A Mathematical Theory of Communication
    Shannon, C. E. · 1948 · Bell System Technical Journal
  3. The Architecture of Cognition
    Anderson, John R. · 2013
  4. Relevance: Communication and Cognition
    Dan Sperber, Deirdre Wilson · 1986
  5. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory
    2010 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
  6. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
    Staczek, John J., van Dijk, Teun A., Kintsch, Walter · 1985 · The Modern Language Journal
  7. Unified theories of cognition
    1991 · Choice Reviews Online
  8. Short-term retention of individual verbal items.
    Peterson, Lloyd, Peterson, Margaret Jean · 1959 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
  9. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf
    Miller, George A., Carroll, John B. · 1957 · The American Journal of Psychology
  10. Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery
    Holland, John H., Holyoak, Keith J., Nisbett, Richard E., Thagard, Paul R., Smoliar, Stephen W. · 1987 · IEEE Expert

Show all 77 references

Cited by (18)

  1. Expert performance: its structure and acquisition.
    Ericsson, K. Anders, Charness, Neil · 1994 · American Psychologist
  2. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space
    Majid, Asifa, Bowerman, Melissa, Kita, Sotaro, Haun, Daniel B.M., Levinson, Stephen C. · 2004 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  3. Individuation, relativity, and early word learning
    Gentner, Dedre, Boroditsky, Lera · 2001 · Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development
  4. The cognitive functions of language
    Carruthers, Peter · 2002 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  5. Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight.
    Schooler, Jonathan W., Ohlsson, Stellan, Brooks, Kevin · 1993 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

See all 373

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.98.3.377
The paper
Hunt, E. B., & Agnoli, F. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.98.3.377

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.