Covariation in natural causal induction.

Cheng, Patricia W., Novick, Laura R.·1992·Psychological Review

Abstract

The covariation component of everyday causal inference has been depicted, in both cognitive and social psychology as well as in philosophy, as heterogeneous and prone to biases. The models and biases discussed in these domains are analyzed with respect to focal sets: contextually determined sets of events over which covariation is computed. Moreover, these models are compared to our probabilistic contrast model, which specifies causes as first and higher order contrasts computed over events in a focal set. Contrary to the previous depiction of covariation computation, the present assessment indicates that a single normative mechanism--the computation of probabilistic contrasts--underlies this essential component of natural causal induction both in everyday and in scientific situations.

Cites (74)

  1. Logic and Conversation
    Grice, H. P. · 1975 · Speech Acts
  2. Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
    Abraham H. Black, William F. Prokasy · 1972 · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks
  3. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
    Cherniak, Christopher, Nisbett, Richard, Ross, Lee · 1983 · The Philosophical Review
  4. The processes of causal attribution.
    Kelley, Harold H. · 1973 · American Psychologist
  5. Untitled work
    1967
  6. Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
    EDWARD E. JONES · 1987 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
  7. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.
    Darley, John M., Latane, Bibb · 1968 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  8. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.
    Kahneman, Daniel, Miller, Dale T. · 1986 · Psychological Review
  9. Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
    Miller, George A., Cantor, Nancy · 1982 · Social Cognition
  10. Attribution theory and research
    Kelley, Harold H., Michela, John L. · 1980 · Annual Review of Psychology

Show all 74 references

Cited by (11)

  1. Perceptual symbol systems
    Barsalou, Lawrence W. · 1999 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  2. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.
    Cheng, Patricia W. · 1997 · Psychological Review
  3. Individual differences in rational thought.
    Keith E. Stanovich, Richard F. West · 1998 · Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  4. Relevance of Error: What Drives Motor Adaptation?
    Wei, Kunlin, Körding, Konrad · 2009 · Journal of Neurophysiology
  5. Within Compound Associations Mediate the Retrospective Revaluation of Causality Judgements
    Dickinson, Anthony, Burke, John · 1996 · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B

See all 406

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Covariation in natural causal induction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.99.2.365
The paper
Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.99.2.365

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.