Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.
Abstract
Four experiments addressed the degree of top-down control over attentional capture in visual search for featural singletons. In a modified spatial cuing paradigm, the spatial relationship and featural similarity of target and distractor singletons were systematically varied. Contrary to previous studies, all 4 experiments showed that when searching for a singleton target, an irrelevant featural singleton captures spatial attention only when defined by the same feature value as the target. Experiments 2, 3 and 4 provided a potential explanation for the discrepancy with previous studies by showing that irrelevant singletons can produce distraction effects that are dissociable from shifts of spatial attention. The results suggest the existence of 2 distinct forms of attentional capture.
Cites (25)
- Shifts in Selective Visual Attention: Towards the Underlying Neural CircuitryKoch, Christof, Ullman, Shimon · 1987 · Matters of Intelligence
- Segregation of Form, Color, Movement, and Depth: Anatomy, Physiology, and PerceptionLivingstone, Margaret, Hubel, David · 1988 · Science
- Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settingsFolk, Charles L., Remington, Roger W., Johnston, James C. · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Nilli Lavie C · 1995 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- A theory of visual attention.Claus Bundesen · 1990 · Psychological Review
- Perceptual selectivity for color and formTheeuwes, Jan · 1992 · Perception & Psychophysics
- Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Hermann Joseph Muller, Patrick Rabbitt · 1989 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Yantis, Steven, Jonides, John · 1990 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Overriding stimulus-driven attentional captureBacon, William F., Egeth, Howard E. · 1994 · Perception & Psychophysics
- Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivityTheeuwes, Jan · 1991 · Perception & Psychophysics
Cited by (13)
- Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selectionTheeuwes, Jan · 2010 · Acta Psychologica
- Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signalSawaki, Risa, Luck, Steven J. · 2010 · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
- Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual AttentionHickey, Clayton, McDonald, John J., Theeuwes, Jan · 2006 · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory InputsGaspelin, Nicholas, Leonard, Carly J., Luck, Steven J. · 2015 · Psychological Science
- Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attentionChica, Ana B., Bartolomeo, Paolo, Lupiáñez, Juan · 2013 · Behavioural Brain Research
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.847
- The paper
- Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.847
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.