Intentional and unintentional contributions of nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods.
Abstract
The nonspecific preparation that follows a warning stimulus (WS) to speed responding to an impending imperative stimulus (IS) is generally viewed as a strategic, intentional process. An alternative view holds that WS acts as a conditioned stimulus that unintentionally elicits a tendency to respond at the moment of IS presentation as a result of a process of trace conditioning. These views were contrasted as explanatory frameworks for classical effects on reaction time of the duration and intertrial variability of the foreperiod, the interval between WS and IS. It is shown that the conditioning view accounts for the available data at least as well as the strategic view. In addition, the results of 3 experiments provide support for the conditioning view by showing that unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation can be dissociated from intentional contributions.
Cites (4)
- Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciencesStevens, James P., Stevens, James P. · 2001
- Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks.Rogers, Robert D., Monsell, Stephen · 1995 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' methodSternberg, Saul · 1969 · Acta Psychologica
- Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time.Drazin, D. H. · 1961 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
Cited by (5)
- Control and interference in task switching—A reviewKiesel, Andrea, Steinhauser, Marco, Wendt, Mike, Falkenstein, Michael, Jost, Kerstin, Philipp, Andrea M., Koch, Iring · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin
- Pip and pop: Nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.Van der Burg, Erik, Olivers, Christian N. L., Bronkhorst, Adelbert W., Theeuwes, Jan · 2008 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Top-down control of the phase of alpha-band oscillations as a mechanism for temporal predictionSamaha, Jason, Bauer, Phoebe, Cimaroli, Sawyer, Postle, Bradley R. · 2015 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in the Foreperiod Effect: TMS Evidence for Dual Mechanisms in Temporal PreparationVallesi, A., Shallice, T., Walsh, V. · 2006 · Cerebral Cortex
- Intentional and Unintentional Contributions to Nonspecific Preparation: Electrophysiological Evidence.Los, Sander A., Heslenfeld, Dirk J. · 2005 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intentional and unintentional contributions of nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.27.2.370
- The paper
- Los, S. A., & Van Den Heuvel, C. E. (2001). Intentional and unintentional contributions of nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.27.2.370
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.