Pip and pop: Nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.
Open accessAbstract
Searching for an object within a cluttered, continuously changing environment can be a very time-consuming process. The authors show that a simple auditory pip drastically decreases search times for a synchronized visual object that is normally very difficult to find. This effect occurs even though the pip contains no information on the location or identity of the visual object. The experiments also show that the effect is not due to general alerting (because it does not occur with visual cues), nor is it due to top-down cuing of the visual change (because it still occurs when the pip is synchronized with distractors on the majority of trials). Instead, we propose that the temporal information of the auditory signal is integrated with the visual signal, generating a relatively salient emergent feature that automatically draws attention. Phenomenally, the synchronous pip makes the visual object pop out from its complex environment, providing a direct demonstration of spatially nonspecific sounds affecting competition in spatial visual processing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multisensory integration can enhance the ability to detect a target stimulus.
“This means that multisensory integration can enhance the ability to detect a target stimulus.”
From The impact of multisensory integration and perceptual load in virtual reality settings on performance, workload and presence (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Perceptual selectivity for color and form
Theeuwes, J. (1992) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211656 · Cited by 1,649 · see citing works
Self-citationGiard, M. H., & Peronnet, F. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563544 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex
Falchier, A., Clavagnier, S., Barone, P., & Kennedy, H. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-13-05749.2002 · Cited by 892 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They are also consistent with neurological evidence that such integration occurs relatively early ( Falchier, Clavagnier, Barone, & Kennedy, 2002; Giard & Peronnet, 1999; Molholm et al., 2002; Talsma, Doty, & Woldorff, 2007) and effortlessly (Vroomen & De Gelder, 2000).”
BackgroundTalsma, D., Doty, T. J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk016 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration.
Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.008 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Marucci, M., Di Flumeri, G., Borghini, G., Sciaraffa, N., Scandola, M., Pavone, E. F., Babiloni, F., Betti, V., & Aricò, P. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84196-8 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Reduced multisensory facilitation in persons with autism
Collignon, O., Charbonneau, G., Peters, F., Nassim, M., Lassonde, M., Lepore, F., Mottron, L., & Bertone, A. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.06.001 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Multisensory enhancement of attentional capture in visual search
Matusz, P. J., & Eimer, M. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0131-8 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Multisensory enhancement of attention depends on whether you are already paying attention
Lunn, J., Sjoblom, A., Ward, J., Soto-Faraco, S., & Forster, S. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.008 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Van der Burg, E., Olivers, C. N. L., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Theeuwes, J.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1053-1065
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W2099329509
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 24.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.vu.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (07079)
- Ministry of Economic Affairs
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- audiovisual integration, visual search, attentional capture, temporal information, multisensory integration, salience, distractor competition, auditory cues
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review