Cited by 485Multisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Pip and pop: Nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.

Open access
Van der Burg, Erik, Olivers, Christian N. L., Bronkhorst, Adelbert W., Theeuwes, Jan·2008·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

Searching for an object within a cluttered, continuously changing environment can be a very time-consuming process. The authors show that a simple auditory pip drastically decreases search times for a synchronized visual object that is normally very difficult to find. This effect occurs even though the pip contains no information on the location or identity of the visual object. The experiments also show that the effect is not due to general alerting (because it does not occur with visual cues), nor is it due to top-down cuing of the visual change (because it still occurs when the pip is synchronized with distractors on the majority of trials). Instead, we propose that the temporal information of the auditory signal is integrated with the visual signal, generating a relatively salient emergent feature that automatically draws attention. Phenomenally, the synchronous pip makes the visual object pop out from its complex environment, providing a direct demonstration of spatially nonspecific sounds affecting competition in spatial visual processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1053

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van der Burg, E., Olivers, C. N. L., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Theeuwes, J.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
2008
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
1053-1065
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W2099329509
Cited by
485
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 19
FWCI
24.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (07079)
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
audiovisual integration, visual search, attentional capture, temporal information, multisensory integration, salience, distractor competition, auditory cues
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review