Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon.
Abstract
After being trained on an oak leaf pattern, pigeons responded to other oak leaf patterns but not to leaf patterns of other species. Thus, graphic variation among the instances of a species is "transparent" to the visual system. At this taxonomic level, concept formation is spontaneous rather than inductive. It is argued that such immediate generalization may be critical to the survival of the organism.
Cited by (5)
- Monkey Responses to Three Different Alarm Calls: Evidence of Predator Classification and Semantic CommunicationSeyfarth, Robert M., Cheney, Dorothy L., Marler, Peter · 1980 · Science
- Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing.William H. Warren · 1984 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
- The Cognitive Basis of Science2002 · Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Visual discrimination of species in dogs (Canis familiaris)Autier-Dérian, Dominique, Deputte, Bertrand L., Chalvet-Monfray, Karine, Coulon, Marjorie, Mounier, Luc · 2013 · Animal Cognition
- The influence of prior belief on scientific thinkingEvans, Jonathan St B. T. · 2002 · The Cognitive Basis of Science
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.68
- The paper
- Cerella, J. (1979). Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.68
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.