Cited by 49Human-Animal Interaction StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Visual discrimination of species in dogs (Canis familiaris)

Autier-Dérian, Dominique, Deputte, Bertrand L., Chalvet-Monfray, Karine, Coulon, Marjorie, Mounier, Luc·2013·Animal Cognition

Abstract

In most social interactions, an animal has to determine whether the other animal belongs to its own species. This perception may be visual and may involve several cognitive processes such as discrimination and categorization. Perceptual categorization is likely to be involved in species characterized by a great phenotypic diversity. As a consequence of intensive artificial selection, domestic dogs, Canis familiaris, present the largest phenotypic diversity among domestic mammals. The goal of our study was to determine whether dogs can discriminate any type of dog from other species and can group all dogs whatever their phenotypes within the same category. Nine pet dogs were successfully trained through instrumental conditioning using a clicker and food rewards to choose a rewarded image, S+, out of two images displayed on computer screens. The generalization step consisted in the presentation of a large sample of paired images of heads of dogs from different breeds and cross-breeds with those of other mammal species, included humans. A reversal phase followed the generalization step. Each of the nine subjects was able to group all the images of dogs within the same category. Thus, the dogs have the capacity of species discrimination despite their great phenotypic variability, based only on visual images of heads.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10071-013-0600-8

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dogs can visually differentiate species, including distinguishing their own species from humans, sheep, and pigs on a computer screen regardless of appearance.

    “Cognitive scientists have recently proven that dogs can visually differentiate species, even virtually. When shown pictures of humans, sheep, pigs, and so on, dogs unfailingly distinguish their own species, regardless of the appearance, on a computer screen (Autier-Dérian et al. 2013).”

    From The Dog-Eared Dictionary: Human-Animal Alliance in Chinese Civilization (2015) · cites this paper as Autier-Dérian et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Autier-Dérian, D., Deputte, B. L., Chalvet-Monfray, K., Coulon, M., & Mounier, L.
Affiliations
  • École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (FR)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • Université de Lyon (FR)
Corresponding author
Autier-Dérian, Dominique
Venue
Animal Cognition
Published
2013-02-14
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
637-651
ISSN
  • 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-9456
OpenAlex
W1993316581
Cited by
49
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Royal Canin
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
species discrimination, dogs, perceptual categorization, visual perception, phenotypic diversity, operant conditioning, generalization, reversal learning
MeSH terms
Animals, Discrimination, Psychological, Dogs, Face, Female, Generalization, Psychological, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review