Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning.

Nelson, Thomas O., Gerler, Daniel, Narens, Louis·1984·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

The feeding of knowing refers to predictions about subsequent memory performance on previously nonrecalled items. The most frequently investigated type of subsequent performance has been recognition. The present research explored predictive accuracy with two new feeling-of-knowing criterion tests (in addition to recognition): relearning and perceptual identification. In two experiments, people attempted to recall the answers to general-information questions such as, "What is the capital of Australia?", then made feeling-of-knowing predictions for all nonrecalled answers, and finally had a criterion test to assess the accuracy of the feeling-of-knowing predictions. Experiment 1 demonstrated that perceptual identification can be employed successfully as a criterion test for the feeling of knowing. This opens a new way for metamemory research via perception. Moreover, the feeling-of-knowing accuracy for predicting perceptual identification was not significantly correlated with the feeling-of-knowing accuracy for predicting recognition, in accord with the idea that these two tests assess memory differently. Experiment 2 demonstrated that relearning performance can also be predicted by feeling-of-knowing judgments. Both experiments showed that there is a positive relationship between the feeling of knowing and the amount of time elapsing before a memory search is terminated during recall. Further analyses showed that this relationship is substantial for nonrecalled items for which the person did not guess an answer (omission errors), but the relationship is null or negative for nonrecalled items that the person guessed incorrectly (commission errors). Several theoretical mechanisms that may underlie the feeling of knowing are proposed.

Cites (4)

  1. Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics
    Wickelgren, Wayne A. · 1977 · Acta Psychologica
  2. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions
    Nelson, Thomas O. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Detecting small amounts of information in memory: Savings for nonrecognized items.
    Nelson, Thomas O. · 1978 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
  4. A comparison of recognition and savings as retrieval measures: A reexamination
    Groninger, Linda Knapp, Groninger, Lowell D. · 1980 · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

Show all 4 references

Cited by (17)

  1. Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings
    Nelson, Thomas O. · 1990 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
  2. Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning
    Koriat, Asher · 1997 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  3. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions
    Nelson, Thomas O. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. How we know--and sometimes misjudge--what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others.
    Raymond S. Nickerson · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. Intuition in the context of discovery
    Bowers, Kenneth S, Regehr, Glenn, Balthazard, Claude, Parker, Kevin · 1990 · Cognitive Psychology

See all 197

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.113.2.282
The paper
Nelson, T. O., Gerler, D., & Narens, L. (1984). Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.113.2.282

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.