Detecting small amounts of information in memory: Savings for nonrecognized items.
Abstract
Three experiments with a total of 102 undergraduates investigated the relative sensitivities of a recognition test and a savings test for detecting information about items that were nonrecallable (forgotten). Four weeks after learning a list of number-word pairs, Ss had a test of recall retention, f
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The discrepancy between savings and recall or recognition has also been found by other authors and appears here as a function of serial position.
“The discrepancy between savings and recall or recognition has also been found by other authors (e.g.,[24,31,32,33]) and appears here as a function of serial position.”
From Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve (2015) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540 · see citing works
Savings and forgetting from long-term memory
Nelson, T. O. (1971) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(71)80030-0 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983 · see citing works
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3629249 · Cited by 1,405 · see citing works
Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve
Murre, J. M. J., & Dros, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120644 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior
Stacy, A. W., & Wiers, R. W. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.49 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Basing Categorization on Individuals and Events
Barsalou, L. W., Huttenlocher, J., & Lamberts, K. (1998) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0687 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
A comparison of recognition and savings as retrieval measures: A reexamination
Groninger, L. K., & Groninger, L. D. (1980) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03334527 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Toward mastering foreign-language translations: transfer between productive and receptive learning
Bernardi, E., Vaughn, K. E., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2024) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2024.2397043
- Authors
- Nelson, T. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
- Published
- 1978-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 453-468
- ISSN
- 0096-1515
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
