References in conversation between experts and novices.
Abstract
In conversation, two people inevitably know different amounts about the topic of discussion, yet to make their references understood, they need to draw on knowledge and beliefs that they share. An expert and a novice talking with each other, therefore, must assess each other's expertise and accommodate to their differences. They do this in part, it is proposed, by assessing, supplying, and acquiring expertise as they collaborate in completing their references. In a study of this accommodation, pairs of people who were or were not familiar with New York City were asked to work together to arrange pictures of New York City landmarks by talking about them. They were able to assess each other's level of expertise almost immediately and to adjust their choice of proper names, descriptions, and perspectives accordingly. In doing so, experts supplied, and novices acquired, specialized knowledge that made referring more efficient.
Cites (3)
- The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in ConversationSchegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail, Sacks, Harvey · 1977 · Language
- Referring as a collaborative processClark, Herbert H., Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna · 1986 · Cognition
- Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication.Krauss, Robert M., Weinheimer, Sidney · 1966 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (31)
- Grounding in communication.Clark, Herbert H., Brennan, Susan E. · 1991 · Perspectives on socially shared cognition.
- Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.Kahneman, Daniel, Miller, Dale T. · 1986 · Psychological Review
- Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Pickering, Martin J., Garrod, Simon · 2004 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- The Affect HeuristicSlovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: References in conversation between experts and novices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.116.1.26
- The paper
- Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.116.1.26
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.