Rules and exemplars in category learning.

Erickson, Michael A., Kruschke, John K.·1998·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Psychological theories of categorization generally focus on either rule- or exemplar-based explanations. We present 2 experiments that show evidence of both rule induction and exemplar encoding as well as a connectionist model, ATRIUM, that specifies a mechanism for combining rule- and exemplar-based representation. In 2 experiments participants learned to classify items, most of which followed a simple rule, although there were a few frequently occurring exceptions. Experiment 1 examined how people extrapolate beyond the range of training. Experiment 2 examined the effect of instance frequency on generalization. Categorization behavior was well described by the model, in which exemplar representation is used for both rule and exception processing. A key element in correctly modeling these results was capturing the interaction between the rule- and exemplar-based representations by using shifts of attention between rules and exemplars.

Cites (74)

  1. Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation
    Rumelhart, David E., Hinton, Geoffrey E., Williams, Ronald J. · 1985
  2. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories
    Rosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B · 1975 · Cognitive Psychology
  3. Adaptive Mixtures of Local Experts
    Jacobs, Robert A., Jordan, Michael I., Nowlan, Steven J., Hinton, Geoffrey E. · 1991 · Neural Computation
  4. Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.
    Squire, Larry R. · 1992 · Psychological Review
  5. Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method
    Kruskal, J. B. · 1964 · Psychometrika
  6. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
    Seidenberg, Mark S., McClelland, James L. · 1989 · Psychological Review
  7. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
    Steven A. Sloman · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin
  8. Toward an instance theory of automatization.
    Logan, Gordon D. · 1988 · Psychological Review
  9. Context theory of classification learning
    Medin, Douglas L., Schaffer, Marguerite M. · 1978 · Psychological Review
  10. Cognition and Categorization
    Rosch, Eleanor, Lloyd, Barbara B. · 2024 · Routledge eBooks

Show all 74 references

Cited by (9)

  1. Human Category Learning
    Ashby, F. Gregory, Maddox, W. Todd · 2005 · Annual Review of Psychology
  2. A temporal ratio model of memory
    Brown, Gordon D. A., Neath, Ian, Chater, Nick · 2007 · Psychological Review
  3. A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning
    Goodman, Noah D., Tenenbaum, Joshua B., Feldman, Jacob, Griffiths, Thomas L. · 2008 · Cognitive Science
  4. A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization
    Ashby, F. Gregory, Ennis, John M., Spiering, Brian J. · 2007 · Psychological Review
  5. The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: Evidence for multiple category learning systems
    Waldron, Elliott M., Ashby, F. Gregory · 2001 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

See all 586

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rules and exemplars in category learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.127.2.107
The paper
Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.127.2.107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.