Rules and exemplars in category learning.
Abstract
Psychological theories of categorization generally focus on either rule- or exemplar-based explanations. We present 2 experiments that show evidence of both rule induction and exemplar encoding as well as a connectionist model, ATRIUM, that specifies a mechanism for combining rule- and exemplar-based representation. In 2 experiments participants learned to classify items, most of which followed a simple rule, although there were a few frequently occurring exceptions. Experiment 1 examined how people extrapolate beyond the range of training. Experiment 2 examined the effect of instance frequency on generalization. Categorization behavior was well described by the model, in which exemplar representation is used for both rule and exception processing. A key element in correctly modeling these results was capturing the interaction between the rule- and exemplar-based representations by using shifts of attention between rules and exemplars.
Cites (74)
- Learning Internal Representations by Error PropagationRumelhart, David E., Hinton, Geoffrey E., Williams, Ronald J. · 1985
- Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categoriesRosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B · 1975 · Cognitive Psychology
- Adaptive Mixtures of Local ExpertsJacobs, Robert A., Jordan, Michael I., Nowlan, Steven J., Hinton, Geoffrey E. · 1991 · Neural Computation
- Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.Squire, Larry R. · 1992 · Psychological Review
- Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical MethodKruskal, J. B. · 1964 · Psychometrika
- A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Seidenberg, Mark S., McClelland, James L. · 1989 · Psychological Review
- The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Steven A. Sloman · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin
- Toward an instance theory of automatization.Logan, Gordon D. · 1988 · Psychological Review
- Context theory of classification learningMedin, Douglas L., Schaffer, Marguerite M. · 1978 · Psychological Review
- Cognition and CategorizationRosch, Eleanor, Lloyd, Barbara B. · 2024 · Routledge eBooks
Cited by (9)
- Human Category LearningAshby, F. Gregory, Maddox, W. Todd · 2005 · Annual Review of Psychology
- A temporal ratio model of memoryBrown, Gordon D. A., Neath, Ian, Chater, Nick · 2007 · Psychological Review
- A rational analysis of rule-based concept learningGoodman, Noah D., Tenenbaum, Joshua B., Feldman, Jacob, Griffiths, Thomas L. · 2008 · Cognitive Science
- A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorizationAshby, F. Gregory, Ennis, John M., Spiering, Brian J. · 2007 · Psychological Review
- The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: Evidence for multiple category learning systemsWaldron, Elliott M., Ashby, F. Gregory · 2001 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rules and exemplars in category learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.127.2.107
- The paper
- Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.127.2.107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.