Cited by 470Categorization, perception, and languageBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceCognitive Science and Education Research

A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning

Open access
Goodman, Noah D., Tenenbaum, Joshua B., Feldman, Jacob, Griffiths, Thomas L.·2008·Cognitive Science

Abstract

This article proposes a new model of human concept learning that provides a rational analysis of learning feature-based concepts. This model is built upon Bayesian inference for a grammatically structured hypothesis space-a concept language of logical rules. This article compares the model predictions to human generalization judgments in several well-known category learning experiments, and finds good agreement for both average and individual participant generalizations. This article further investigates judgments for a broad set of 7-feature concepts-a more natural setting in several ways-and again finds that the model explains human performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03640210701802071

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bayesian models of cognition have primarily flourished as explanations of the complex dependency of behavior on the environment in domains including intuitive physics, causal learning, perception, motor control, and language.

    “Bayesian models of cognition have primarily flourished as explanations of the complex dependency of behavior on the environment in domains including intuitive physics, causal learning, perception, motor control, and language [1-10]”

    From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [7]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
  2. Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. (2005). Categorization inside and outside the lab. In W. K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. W. Wolff (Eds.), Learning and using relational categories (pp. 151-175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  3. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplarbased connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
  4. Markman, A. B., & Stilwell, C. H. (2001). Rolegoverned categories.Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 13, 329-358.
  5. von Humboldt, W. (1863/1988). On language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Noah D.
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
108-154
ISSN
  • 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6709
OpenAlex
W2142336306
Cited by
469
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 29
FWCI
23.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0339062)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
Bayesian inference, category learning, rational analysis, individual differences in learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review