Cited by 798Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

A temporal ratio model of memory

Brown, Gordon D. A., Neath, Ian, Chater, Nick·2007·Psychological Review

Abstract

A model of memory retrieval is described. The model embodies 4 main claims: (a) temporal memory--traces of items are represented in memory partly in terms of their temporal distance from the present; (b) scale-similarity--similar mechanisms govern retrieval from memory over many different timescales; (c) local distinctiveness--performance on a range of memory tasks is determined by interference from near psychological neighbors; and (d) interference-based forgetting--all memory loss is due to interference and not trace decay. The model is applied to data on free recall and serial recall. The account emphasizes qualitative similarity in the retrieval principles involved in memory performance at all timescales, contrary to models that emphasize distinctions between short-term and long-term memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.114.3.539

Cites

261 of 261 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models of free recall such as Search of Associative Memory and SIMPLE use the previously recalled word to cue the next word, and have been productively used to account for the dependencies seen when people attempt to recall a list of words.

    “Models of free recall such as Search of Associative Memory [95] and SIMPLE [96] use the previously recalled word to cue the next word, and has been productively used to account for the dependencies seen when people attempt to recall a list of words.”

    From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [96]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 262 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2007
Volume
114
Issue
3
Pages
539-576
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2109740547
Cited by
798
References
262
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 41
FWCI
19.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (R000239351; RES 000231038)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (R000239351; RES 000231038)
  • Leverhulme Trust (F/215/AY)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
memory retrieval, temporal memory, temporal distance, scale similarity, local distinctiveness, free recall, serial recall, short-term memory, long-term memory
MeSH terms
Attention, Humans, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Serial Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review