Metacomprehension of text material.
Abstract
Subjects' abilities to predict future multiple-choice test performance after reading sections of text were investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, subjects who scored above median test performance showed some accuracy in their predictions of that test performance. They gave higher mean ratings to material related to correct than to incorrect test answers. Subjects who scored below median test performance did not show this prediction accuracy. The retention interval between reading and the test was manipulated in Experiment 2. Subjects who were tested after at least a 24-hr delay showed results identical to those of Experiment 1. However, when subjects were tested immediately after reading, subjects above and below median test performance gave accurate predictions for the first immediate test. In contrast, both types of subjects gave inaccurate predictions for the second immediate test. Structural variables, such as length, serial position, and hierarchical level of the sections of text were related to subjects' predictions. These variables, in general, were not related to test performance, although the predictions were related to test performance in the conditions described above.
Cites (3)
- Perception in chessChase, William G., Simon, Herbert A. · 1973 · Cognitive Psychology
- Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledgeChiesi, Harry L., Spilich, George J., Voss, James F. · 1979 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
- Training for calibrationLichtenstein, Sarah, Fischhoff, Baruch · 1980 · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
Cited by (13)
- Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New FindingsNelson, Thomas O. · 1990 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
- Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the WorkplaceDunning, David, Heath, Chip, Suls, Jerry M. · 2004 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own IncompetenceDunning, David, Johnson, Kerri, Ehrlinger, Joyce, Kruger, Justin · 2003 · Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.Thiede, Keith W., Anderson, Mary C. M., Therriault, David · 2003 · Journal of Educational Psychology
- The Dunning–Kruger EffectDunning, David · 2011 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metacomprehension of text material. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.663
- The paper
- Maki, R. H., & Berry, S. L. (1984). Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.