Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory.

Abstract

Comparisons of the relative sensitivity of direct and indirect tasks can provide definitive evidence for unconscious memory when the direct and indirect tasks are matched on all characteristics except instructions. To demonstrate unconscious memory in normal adults, subjects first viewed pairs of words and named one cued word in each pair. During the subsequent assessment of memory, new words and either previously cued words (Experiment 1) or previously uncued words (Experiments 2A and 2B) were presented against a background mask. The subjects judged whether a word was old or new (direct task) or whether the contrast between a word and the mask was high or low (indirect task). For cued words, the direct task was more sensitive than the indirect task. However, for uncued words, the indirect task was initially more sensitive than the direct task, even though the direct task exhibited hypermnesia so that it became more sensitive than the indirect task across trial blocks. The greater initial sensitivity of the indirect task implicates unconscious processes underlying memory for the uncued words. These results indicate that unconscious processes in normal adults can be revealed through comparisons of comparable direct and indirect measures.

Cites (29)

1. Untitled work
   1967 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
2. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.
   Joan Gay Snodgrass, June Corwin · 1988 · Journal of Experimental Psychology General
3. Implicit memory: History and current status.
   Schacter, Daniel L. · 1987 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
4. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.
   Jacoby, Larry L., Dallas, Mark · 1981 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
5. How many memory systems are there?
   Tulving, Endel · 1985 · American Psychologist
6. Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.
   Graf, Peter, Schacter, Daniel L. · 1985 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
7. Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel Tulving
   Henry Lederer Roediger III, Fergus I. M. Craik · 2014 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
8. The Cognitive Unconscious
   Kihlstrom, John F. · 1987 · Science
9. Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal
   Holender, Daniel · 1986 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
10. Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized
    Kunst-Wilson, William Raft, Zajonc, R. B · 1980 · Science

Show all 29 references

Cited by (19)

1. Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems
   Shanks, David R., St. John, Mark F. · 1994 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
2. Memory and Working-with-Memory: A Component Process Model Based on Modules and Central Systems
   Moscovitch, Morris · 1992 · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
3. Attention, Memory, and the “Noticing” Hypothesis
   Robinson, Peter · 1995 · Language Learning
4. Implicit learning: news from the front
   Cleeremans, Axel, Destrebecqz, Arnaud, Boyer, Maud · 1998 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
5. The Science of False Memory
   2005

See all 255