Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes.
Abstract
What are the sources of metamemory judgments in question answering? Experiment 1 showed that the level of confidence in the correctness of a recalled answer (CL) is a reliable measure (test-retest G = .87) and a valid predictor of recognition (G = .55/.58). In contrast, the feeling of knowing the correct answer (FOK), although reliable (G = .82), is a poor predictor of recognition (G = .11). In Experiment 2 it was discovered that FOK levels are more highly correlated with beliefs about what should be known than are CL judgments. Controlling for the relationship between FOK and those beliefs eliminates any correlation between FOK and recognition (G drops from .27 to .08), which is not the case with CL (G remains as high as .52). These data suggest that CL is based on the retrieval of at least some elements of the right answer, whereas FOK may be derived from recency or familiarity effects elicited by the question itself.
Cites (3)
- Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New FindingsNelson, Thomas O. · 1990 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
- A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictionsNelson, Thomas O. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
- Memory and metamemory: a study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patientsShimamura, Arthur P., Squire, Larry R. · 1986 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Cited by (17)
- How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowingKoriat, Asher · 1993 · Psychological Review
- Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process?Efklides, Anastasia · 2006 · Educational Research Review
- Metacognition and consciousnessKoriat, Asher · 2007 · The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness
- What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.Reder, Lynne M., Ritter, Frank E. · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model.Hélie, Sébastien, Sun, Ron · 2010 · Psychological Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.18.1.142
- The paper
- Costermans, J., Lories, G., & Ansay, C. (1992). Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.18.1.142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.