Cited by 294Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Memory and metamemory: a study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients

Shimamura, Arthur P., Squire, Larry R.·1986·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Accuracy of the feeling of knowing was tested in patients with Korsakoff's syndrome, patients prescribed electroconvulsive therapy, four other cases of amnesia, and control subjects. In Experiment 1, we tested feeling-of-knowing accuracy for the answers to general information questions that could not be recalled. Subjects were asked to rank nonrecalled questions in terms of how likely they thought they would be able to recognize the answers and were then given a recognition test for these items. Only patients with Korsakoff's syndrome were impaired in making feeling-of-knowing predictions. The other amnesic patients were as accurate as control subjects in their feeling-of-knowing predictions. In Experiment 2, we replicated these findings in a sentence memory paradigm that tested newly learned information. The results showed that impaired metamemory is not an obligatory feature of amnesia, because amnesia can occur without detectable metamemory deficits. The impaired metamemory exhibited by patients with Korsakoff's syndrome reflects a cognitive impairment that is not typically observed in other forms of amnesia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.452

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Possible anatomical substrates of metacognition have been investigated for several cognitive domains (exteroceptive perceptual performance, memory) but not for interoception or homeostasis/allostasis.

    “Turning to the neuroanatomy of metacognition, possible anatomical substrates have been investigated for several cognitive domains, in particular (extero)perceptual performance or memory (Shimamura and Squire, 1986; Schnyer et al., 2004; Fleming et al., 2010, 2012, 2014; McCurdy et al., 2013), but not, to our knowledge, for interoception or homeostasis/allostasis.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R.
Affiliations
VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
1986-07
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
452-460
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2047386732
Cited by
294
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH08992, MH24600)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
feeling of knowing, metamemory, amnesia, Korsakoff syndrome, electroconvulsive therapy, recognition memory, memory confidence, sentence memory, general knowledge questions
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Amnestic Disorder, Alcoholism, Amnesia, Awareness, Cognition, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review